Truth Warrior

Saturday, May 06, 2006

Baptists and the Reformation

As the Protestant Reformers separated from the Roman Catholic Church they usually took with them some of her practices and doctrine with them. Two of the practices that the Protestants maintained were infant baptism and a state-church policy, putting them at strong conflict with the Anabaptists. Reformers such as Martin Luther and John Calvin were antagonistic toward Anabaptists. In some cases Reformers would even prescribe death to those who persisted in the “Anabaptist heresy.”*

John Smyth was an early Baptist minister of England, and a defender of the principle of religious liberty. Many historians consider John Smyth as a founder of the modern Baptists.

Smyth was ordained as an Anglican priest in England. Soon after his ordination, he broke with the Church of England and became a Separatist. In 1609, Smyth came to a belief in believer's baptism and opposed to infant baptism. Smyth baptized himself and his followers. It is true that he later rejected this baptism and sought baptism from the Mennonites, but this brought about a separation between Smyth and a group of Baptists led by Thomas Helwys a well to do layman. The churches that descended from Smyth and Helwys were of the General Baptist persuasion.

Let me back up a bit. Baptists were first identified by the name General Baptists in 17th century England. They were called General Baptists because they believed in a general atonement meaning they taught that the death of Christ made salvation possible for any persons who voluntarily exercises faith in Christ. In my estimation this is biblical, sound, and true. However, these churches were also Arminian in tendency and held the possibility of falling away from grace. In my estimation this is not biblical, it is unsound, and false. The earliest known church of this type was founded about 1609 in the Netherlands. Early leaders of the movement were those afore mentioned, namely Thomas Helwys and John Smyth (circa 1560-1612). Smyth and Helwys gathered a band of believers in the Midlands, but migrated to Amsterdam, the Netherlands in 1607. In 1611, after Smyth left to join the Mennonite, Helwys led a small group back to England and established in Spitalfield what appears to have been the first General Baptist church on English soil. Smyth and Helwys were also ardent defenders of religious liberty for all men.

General Baptists slowly spread through England and into America, but never seemed to command as vital an existence as the Particular (or Calvinistic) Baptists. The English General Baptists declined due to several factors. Early Quaker converts were drawn from the General Baptists, and many other churches moved into Unitarianism. Most surviving Arminian elements would eventually be absorbed into the Baptist Union of Great Britain, though a few remain semi-autonomous as the Old Baptist Union.

Baptist history helps us to grow and mature in our convictions. It facilitates learning from our past mistakes so we may correct them, and strengthens us in our veracity so that we may become more authentic as Christians. Though there are incidents in our history that may make us blush, Baptist history is rich, and full of events that have benefited all people. To God be the glory!

* See Anderson and Gower, Biblical Distinctives of Baptists (Adult Teacher), p.81

Next post: Baptists since the Reformation

11 Comments:

  • Baptist history is interesting.

    Almost as interesting as Plymouth Brethren history.

    God Bless

    Matthew

    By Blogger Matthew Celestine, at 6/5/06 12:40 PM  

  • Nice historical background! What persuasion of Baptist are you, Calvinist or Arminian?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7/5/06 9:33 PM  

  • Matthew,
    Thanks, I work with a man who belongs to a church called Mayfair Plymouth; we have brief, yet good conversations.

    Bobby,
    Are you trying to pin me down?

    Perhaps I will post on your question very soon. For now let me say that I am from a “proper” Presbyterian (Scottish Reform) background, and have oft read from my grandma’s Oxford KJV Scofield’s Study Bible. I have not rebelled against my heritage totally when I became a Christian.

    I am enjoying the reads I get from at least one who holds to and explains Affective Theology very well. ;~)

    By Blogger J. Wendell, at 7/5/06 11:21 PM  

  • John,

    No more than your wife is, with me, on Eph. 1 over at her site ;-)!

    I'm glad the Affective stuff is coming across clearly. It definitely leads to holding to a form of election, and sees God's unilateral initiatory work in salvation!

    I'll keep checking your blog, I'll look forward to hearing your view on the Calv/Arm. issue :-)!

    In Christ,
    Bobby

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8/5/06 12:50 AM  

  • Is the man's congregation Brethren, John?

    By Blogger Matthew Celestine, at 8/5/06 6:22 AM  

  • This is a good series and very educational.

    Thanks!

    By Blogger Joe, at 8/5/06 7:42 AM  

  • Thank you for your kind words Joe.

    It has been very educational for me too. I have wanted to do this for a long time and never have untill now.

    By Blogger J. Wendell, at 8/5/06 8:52 AM  

  • By Blogger J. Wendell, at 8/5/06 1:33 PM  

  • Matthew, I thought it was then I found his church at the above link I have not explored the site yet, but he seems to be a fine Christian man.

    By Blogger J. Wendell, at 8/5/06 1:38 PM  

  • Thanks.

    It is Congregational.

    I am guessing the Plymouth connection is with the Pilgrim Fathers who sailed from Plymouth?

    Every Blessing in Christ

    Matthew

    By Blogger Matthew Celestine, at 8/5/06 2:42 PM  

  • Interesting, John. Like Bobby, I look forward to more on that issue. Tom (my husband) tells me the General Assoc. of Reg. Baptists once voted on making 5pt Calvinism a test of fellowship, whch means that would have been a turn away from their history, but it did not succeed.

    I'll look forward to your future discussions :)

    By Blogger Unknown, at 14/5/06 10:44 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

 

Who Links Here