Truth Warrior

Thursday, March 02, 2006

The Qualities of the Pastor, NOT the Qualifications of a Pastor

The office of a pastor is misunderstood by many. Some may view the pastor as one who carries the load of the church. To some he is an employee of the church to perform certain spelled out duties such as a CEO, and/or CFO. To others he is the president of the board of directors that call themselves deacons (another misunderstood office). The Bible points up that a being a pastor is not so much about what a man does, as much as it is who he is. It’s not his position in the church described, it is his profession of Christ defined. It’s not about his certified qualifications, it's about his character qualities. Some may ask, "What is a biblical pastor?” To answer this question our appeal must be to the Scriptures.

If this were an expositional piece on Acts (and it is not) one may perhaps lay it out like this:
Paul's example to pastors (please read Acts 20:17-27).
Note: Paul is not using mere words here. Paul is not being haughty, with a "looking down his nose" attitude. Instead, Paul has lived the life he is talking about. Paul is a fine example of a pastor. May God raise up more like him in our day.
Paul's exhortation to pastors (please read Acts 20: 28-35).
Note: Keep in mind that Paul is exhorting these elders in words also. Paul is bringing to their memory what he did and how he has lived, etching in their mind the training they have received (v.31). Paul is saying in effect, "...this is how to be a good minister ... so be a good minister!" You and I can, and should be good ministers in our day.

These thoughts of Paul were expanded, and delivered to one of his young protégés... Timothy.

This is a true saying, if a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work. A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behavior, given to hospitality, apt to teach; not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous; that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity; (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?) Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil. Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil. (1Timothy 3:1-7)

Paul parallels these thoughts when he addressed the following shipment to another one of his protégés, Titus,

If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly. For a bishop must be blameless, as the steward of God; not self-willed, not soon angry, not given to wine, no striker, not given to filthy lucre; But a lover of hospitality, a lover of good men, sober, just, holy, temperate; Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers. (Titus 1: 6-9)

Let's unpack these thoughts of Paul so we too can value the tenacity of our pastor/s. Incidentally, taking a closer look is not the same as inventing hidden meanings in our texts. There is enough here to convey just what the Holy Spirit intends.

In 1Timothy 1:5; 3:1; 4:9; Titus 3:8; Paul uses the exact same segue from one thought to the next. It is, in effect, an introduction to a new body of ideas he wishes to convey. It is Paul's way of arresting our interest so we will pay attention to what will follow. He comes out like the quickest draw in the west, with two six guns bold and blazing... "This is a true saying..."! The word in the Greek is pis-tos' it means, "objectively trustworthy; subjectively trustful: - believe (-ing, -r), faithful (-ly), sure, true." (Strong's) With our attention captured, and focused on what follows Paul says, "...if a man..." (ei tis GK. it means "any man." I take this to mean any man: when this was first written, when this was first read, when it is being read in our day, and when future generations read it till the Lord comes) "...desire the office of a bishop..." (Strong's says, "episkopē ...specifically [means] the Christian 'episcopate':- the office of a 'bishop', bishoprick, visitation." he desireth a good work.")

In both letters it is clear that Paul is speaking about the office, position, responsibility, or, more biblically, the stewardship of a bishop.
This is a true saying, if a man (ei tes, any man) desire (oregomai) the office of a bishop, he desireth (epithumeō) a good work. The fact that the first word translated "desire" oregomai is in the middle voice and carries the meaning, to stretch oneself, that is, reach out after (long for)... and the second word translated "desire" from epithumeō to set the heart upon, that is, long for (rightfully or otherwise):- covet, desire... lends credence to the proposal that this is a permanent office of the church that any man through the church age may desire. "What kind of work is it?", one may ask. It is a good work! John Darby has commented on this saying, "The apostle next points out to Timothy the qualities necessary for a bishop or a deacon... He supposes here that there were some who desired to undertake this work. It was a good work." (Synopsis of the Old and New Testament J. N. Darby) I would add that, "...it still is a good work!"

The qualities are then listed these should be plain enough to understand: read them trough carefully. Highlight the one's that are in both passages note the ones that are not. It may also be worth while to notice the positives and negative (eg. what a pastor is and what a pastor is not). See if you agree with me that a biblical pastor is who a man is not what he does. It is who a man is (inwardly) that determines what he does (outwardly) not the other way around.

The next post: The Functions of a Pastor

31 Comments:

  • Hi John

    I have always beleive that God picks who He want by His all knowing and that person is already serving His poeple.

    Like David was a shepherd when He was a little boy( God did that )and God used that for plan.

    The same all though the Bible.

    The pastor should have already been doing pastoral service and loving God childern.


    I like reading your wisdom John.

    Thank you So Much

    By Blogger forgiven, at 2/3/06 10:17 AM  

  • Matthew,
    Did you read this post of mine that I did a while ago:
    here?

    It may clear up some of our differences ... or who knows ... maybe it will create more discussion!

    By Blogger J. Wendell, at 2/3/06 7:01 PM  

  • John, I am still troubled by your identifying elders with pastors again.

    I also think your emphasis on the qualities of the pastor as opposed to the qualifications better suits the position that pastorship is a gift rather than an office.

    I am impressed at your citing Darby. Is that your own copy of the Synopsis or from the on-line edition?

    Darby distinguished elders and pastors. He saw the work of elders as being to some extent necessary today, though he believed that there was no power to appoint elders in the Church today.
    He did pray continually for God to raise up sound pastors, though the sort of pastors he sought would probably not be the same as the average Baptist pastor.

    Every Blessing in Christ

    Matthew

    By Blogger Matthew Celestine, at 2/3/06 7:13 PM  

  • Yes, I did take a look at that. I cannot say I agree with all your conclusions.

    By Blogger Matthew Celestine, at 2/3/06 7:20 PM  

  • Hi Matthew,

    "The apostle felt this: it was a true and faithful saying; but certain qualities were needed to make any one fit for such a charge. Gifts are not included among them, unless the being apt to teach might be so considered; but even this is presented as a quality — the man must have 'aptness' for it — not as a gift." J.N. Darby

    I couldn't let this get by ;-)

    Now to the elder/shepherd issue: Peter makes this link in 1Pet.5:1-4
    See if you follow this reasoning... Peter addressed the elders to feed the flock which is among you, taking oversight thereof (v. 2)
    "Feed" and "flock" are pastoral words, and "oversight" is a form of the word "overseer".
    v. 4 refers to Christ as the "Cheif Shepherd." The implication is that the elders in this passage were shepherds and Christ was the "Cheif Shepherd." In other words, men were the pastors and Christ was the Cheif Pastor.

    It is OK to disagree, but this is the view of Baptists. Can you see why I might link the three titles with the one position? :-)

    By Blogger J. Wendell, at 2/3/06 7:40 PM  

  • Yes, I can see your reasoning.

    By Blogger Matthew Celestine, at 3/3/06 3:39 AM  

  • Hi Doug,

    Thank you... for your contribution of wisdom here. I concur with your analogy of David. Great thoughts!

    Thank you Matthew,
    for your many blessings.

    brother John

    By Blogger J. Wendell, at 3/3/06 6:55 AM  

  • I agree with your conclusion that the qualifications are character related. This is one of the reasons why I think congregational voting on a pastor is a horrible idea!

    In order for a congregation to vote on a guy, they have to grill him on all these issues, which would soon devolve into an explanation of how sinful the man is. I think this is better handled by a board or selected group getting into these details.

    It also shows the importance of a church taking their time to find a pastor. It's not as simple as experience and education--you've got to know the man. That takes time.

    By Blogger jeff, at 3/3/06 8:57 AM  

  • Hi Jeff,
    Ah... the politics of "church".

    I half agree… it is not at all simple. A congregation should be prayerful and discerning in who it chooses as a search team. The team must be prayerful and discerning and systematic in their approach. When a church has more than one pastor/elder they should have limited involvement in this without leaving their post. Deacons may also be suited to have more intimate time with a candidate too.

    When all of this is done the church has the responsibility to meet with the candidate in several settings, and that opportunity should be provided. Once is not enough. After this, (with much prayer taking place along the way) and in an appropriate setting the congregation should discuss together the possibility of extending a call with all who have been involved in the search team. (I have left out many details here about the church structure that I’m involved with.) There should be an understanding of doctrine, experience, education, along with the character issues. This can, and in my church, does take many months and often more than a year before a call is extended. This process also involves some expense, but it should not cause a burden or strain to the church.

    Here is the other half in the Bible:
    The Church disciplines its members (Matt.18:15-17).
    The Church appoints its deacons (Acts 6: 1-7).
    The Church sends out its missionaries who are accountable to the Church (Acts 13:1-3; 14:26, 27).
    The Church judges and restores its members (1Cor.5:1-5, 12, 13; 1Cor.2:5:7).
    Each Church is accountable to God (Rev. 2-3)

    These are five reasons why I think congregational voting on a pastor is a biblical idea! Any pastor worth his salt will bring up and nurture a congregation in the Word so they will have the aptitude for such a procedure.

    I do not have any use for a denominational synod, or assembly, or vicar appointing a “pastor” to a church.

    Thanks for your thoughts!
    brother John

    By Blogger J. Wendell, at 4/3/06 8:24 AM  

  • John, in Acts 6, the deacons were chosen by the congregation, but they were appointed by the apostles (verse 3 and 6).

    By Blogger Matthew Celestine, at 4/3/06 2:30 PM  

  • I hear ya. It's not that simple. However, I still think I'm right! As always. I agree with dispraxic that the apostles appointed people. I see that as the testimony of scripture, that a limited group appointed people. Paul told Titus to set the church in order and appoint elders (Titus 1:5). He didn't tell Titus to take a vote. Democracy is not part of New Testament church structure, as I see it. Our church takes a congregational vote, but that is one tool for the board to use in deciding, the vote decides nothing.

    By Blogger jeff, at 5/3/06 3:17 PM  

  • Jeff, who gave the board authority to make appointments?

    By Blogger Matthew Celestine, at 5/3/06 3:28 PM  

  • Well, the board that drew up the by-laws did!

    By Blogger jeff, at 5/3/06 7:56 PM  

  • Hi Jeff,
    did you notice that I never called this a democratic form of church government? It is not patterned after the secular U.S. government to the contrary the U.S. government was patterned after the Preysbyterian form of government.

    Independent Baptists are
    republican and congregational in their form of government

    By Blogger J. Wendell, at 5/3/06 8:25 PM  

  • Okay, Jeff, who gave those guys the authority to draw up those by-laws?

    God Bless

    Matthew

    By Blogger Matthew Celestine, at 6/3/06 4:26 AM  

  • Wendell: I don't see any biblical proof for voting on pastors, whether it is democratic or republican in form.

    DF: No one gives anyone authority. All we attempted to do was go on what it seems scripture directs us to do. Scripture seems to approve of the idea of a select group of churhc leaders to make decisions impacting the church, including the approval of elders.

    By Blogger jeff, at 6/3/06 9:13 AM  

  • Jeff, you use the word 'selct'.

    If they 'select', they must derive their authority from somewhere. It is not just anyone who has such 'selectness'.

    How does anyone become a 'select' church leader?

    Every Blessing in Christ

    Matthew

    By Blogger Matthew Celestine, at 6/3/06 9:45 AM  

  • Helpful discussion from the men folk!

    's 'bout time :)

    By Blogger Unknown, at 6/3/06 8:22 PM  

  • Huh?

    By Blogger Matthew Celestine, at 7/3/06 5:15 AM  

  • df: don't worry about it, it's not your church! But seriously, At some point, someone has to select someone otherwise no one would be selected for anything. I don't want to say it's the holy spirit because lots of good churches have selected bad pastors, so I don't want to blame it on God. The pastoral epistles make it clear that there is a group of people who make decisions for the church. based on the criteria given to select those men you are to base your selection. What's you point with your leading questions? I know you must have one.

    By Blogger jeff, at 7/3/06 8:58 AM  

  • j. wendell: I can't believe Christians can get in a stew over this. I think you did a great job in your post, and if I disagree with how your (church, denomination, etc.) interprets what the Bible says about pastors, so what?

    Each of us has an inalienable right to be wrong.

    By Blogger Joe, at 7/3/06 2:43 PM  

  • Jeff, sorry to ask leading questions. My point is that there is no longer any power of appointment today. Titus and Timothy received the power to ordain from the apostles. Nobody else was delegated that authority. This is something that the Church needs to accept and deal with.

    We need to bear in mind that the epistles of Titus and Timothy were personally addressed to them. We cannot do what they did unless we have the same power. We cannot just arrogate it to ourselves without divine warrant.

    Every Blessing in Christ

    Matthew

    By Blogger Matthew Celestine, at 7/3/06 3:33 PM  

  • Hi, John.

    Do you have one man in your group there who is considered your "pastor"? Or many?

    By Blogger Bill Heroman, at 7/3/06 8:29 PM  

  • Hero Bill!
    Welcome back, here is a place that may help to answer your question. Please explore the site... we may have more to discuss after word.

    I remember, "...be a pastor or have a pastor, but..." ;~)

    Say can anyone tell me when local churches stopped having leaders?

    brother John

    By Blogger J. Wendell, at 7/3/06 10:01 PM  

  • DF: I hear your point and agree, which is why I said the bit about not blaming the Holy Spirit, doesn't quite work that way now. However, a choice still needs to be made. Even though WEndell did a fine job making a post on proving voting, it still isn't voting by the whole congregation. That's my point in all this, going back to the beginning, the criteria for voting is not something everyone is going to be, or even should be, aware of.

    If it is discovered that your potential elder is "given to much wine," is this something that is better handled by a select group or brought out before eveyrone so even though he was rejected for service at least we disgraced him publicly! I don't see the virtue in this. I think chuches treat pastors bad enough without having to add this garbage on top of it.

    By Blogger jeff, at 8/3/06 9:11 AM  

  • Hi Joe,
    thanks for your vote of confidence!

    brother John

    By Blogger J. Wendell, at 8/3/06 10:58 AM  

  • Brother Matthew,
    I love your tenacity!

    By Blogger J. Wendell, at 8/3/06 11:00 AM  

  • Hi Jeff,
    Perhaps in a church of a mixed multitude (saved and unsaved) that would be true.

    Baptists, however, hold to the doctrine of regenerate church membership. Since this is the case we can and do apply 1Cor.6:2-4,

    Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life? If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge who are least esteemed in the church.

    If it is discovered that anyone in a local church has a glaring sin (including elders) Matthew 18:15-17 instructs,

    Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established. And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican.

    Couple this with further instructions from Paul,

    Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted. Bear ye one another's burdens, and so fulfil the law of Christ. (Gal.6:1)

    BTW if someone is treating an elder contemptuously THAT IS S-I-N… SIN! It is a grievous sin! Gossip, slander, mocking, any form of verbal insult or abuse, treating an elder badly… these are shameful and should be corrected immediately! How? Put the instructions for church discipline (I prefer to call this process restoration) above into action!

    The local church should be a place of delightful growth see my short post entitled, “What a Fellowship!

    Thank you all for discussing this in a fair mannered way there is yet more to come!

    Cheerfully in the Savior,
    brother John

    By Blogger J. Wendell, at 8/3/06 11:09 AM  

  • "BTW if someone is treating an elder contemptuously THAT IS S-I-N… SIN! It is a grievous sin! Gossip, slander, mocking, any form of verbal insult or abuse, treating an elder badly… these are shameful and should be corrected immediately!

    Okay, Dude.
    Now that's just scary...
    IMHO :)

    By Blogger Bill Heroman, at 20/3/06 4:12 PM  

  • "BTW if someone is treating an elder contemptuously THAT IS S-I-N… SIN! It is a grievous sin! Gossip, slander, mocking, any form of verbal insult or abuse, treating an elder badly… these are shameful and should be corrected immediately!

    Okay, Dude.
    Now that's just scary...
    IMHO :)

    Yes, Hb, it is a scary thing to fall into this sin especially those who know the Word (1Tim.5).

    By Blogger J. Wendell, at 24/3/06 1:43 PM  

  • Okay, Dude.
    Now that's just scary...
    IMHO :)

    Yes, HB, it is a scary thing to fall into this sin especially those who know the Word "Rebuke not an elder... (1Tim.5).

    By Blogger J. Wendell, at 24/3/06 1:45 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

 

Who Links Here